Local Presidents:
Last week an MOU was negotiated by the General Committee regarding swine flu.
The Agency has begun to conduct formal discussions with staff regarding the
contents of this agreement.
I don’t know what Agency official will say about the MOU, but I have received
some reports that SSA management is telling employees that if they refuse to
interview clients who appear to have swine flu symptoms that they will be
disciplined.
The MOU refers to alternative protocols for interviewing in item 4 and requires
SSA management to inform those with symptoms that they have alternative ways of
dealing with the Agency other than face to face interviews.
In addition, Article 9, Section 6 of the contract requires SSA to make
appropriate arrangements for employees who interview individuals with a known
serious communicable disease. The National Institute of Health defines swine
flu as a pandemic and refers to it as a serious communicable disease. According
to the contract if an employee interviews such an individual they have a right
for an Agency financed medical exam on administrative time and SSA will provide
the employee with workers compensation filing instructions and forms. This
section has always been interpreted as allowing the employee to refer the
interview to management because of the potential for spreading of the
communicable disease.
Also, the Executive Order on health and safety in the federal workplace and its
implementing regulations have provisions regarding imminent danger which allow
employees to refuse a work assignment if they have a legitimate belief that
performing the work assignment will subject them to adverse health and safety
consequences. Certainly contracting swine flu would be such a potential adverse
consequence of interviewing someone with symptoms of a serious communicable
disease. Therefore employees have a right to refuse to interview someone with
swine flu symptoms due to the imminent danger involved of transmition of a
serious communicable disease that has resulted in thousands of deaths.
It is essential that the union attend these formal discussions and take the
opportunity to exercise the union’s rights to speak at such formal discussions
and explain the union’s views of what employees rights are regarding swine flu
interviews.
If the Agency fails to give the union notice and an opportunity to attend and
speak at such formal discussions, we should file a ULP.
In addition, SSA will be conducting formal discussions on Article 21 alignment
statements. The union should also attend these discussions and take careful
notes regarding what SSA is saying during these formal discussions. The union
should also use the opportunity to express its view that employees are only
required to produce work performance regarding the performance standards that
they are given. Alignment statements are intended to inform employees on what
the Agency’s goals are but are not intended to be substitutes for performance
standards. Goal achievement is not a performance standard unless it is clearly
contained in the performance standard narrative
Please forward this message to your Local Representatives.
Witold Skwierczynski